Skip to content

Nobody Is Going to Stop You From Issuing a Certification

A certification you create is a claim, not a credential. What makes it worth paying for is how hard you make it to earn.

Justin Allan, NP5 min read

A modest course building at evening where a crane lowers a brand-new glowing upper floor — a hall with a ribbon-and-medal emblem.

Go and look up the certification you are proudest of.

Not the license. The other one — the letters you added after a weekend course, the ones on your email signature. Find out which board recognizes it. Check whether your state has ever heard of the organization that issued it.

For a great many professional certifications, the answer is that nobody recognizes it, because nobody was ever asked to. The company that sold it decided the certification existed, and that was the entire process.

None of this is meant to make you feel bad about a certificate on your wall. It matters because you are about to be on the other side of that transaction, and you should understand what you are actually selling.

So does a certification mean anything?

To a board, usually nothing. To the professional who earned it, often quite a lot.

Both of those are true at once and neither cancels the other out. A certification you create does not change anyone's scope of practice or satisfy any regulator. What it does is give a professional a way to show that they went and learned something specific, and put a marker on it that other people in their field can see.

That is a real thing to want. Professionals collect letters for the same reason anyone does anything visible — it is evidence of effort in a job where most effort is invisible. If your course genuinely teaches something worth knowing, attaching a designation to it is not a con. It is a label on work that was already done.

The dishonesty enters somewhere else, and it is worth naming exactly where.

Then can I just make one?

Yes. There is no permission to obtain and no body to notify. If you are not attaching official continuing education credit, you are essentially unregulated here.

The mechanics are almost disappointingly simple. Your course platform already does most of it. Build the course. Build a comprehensive exam at the end — a hundred questions or more, not a five-item quiz. Set a passing threshold. The platform issues a certificate on completion, you keep the record of who holds it, and you define the designation they may use.

If you want it to feel weightier, have the certificate printed properly and mailed. It costs very little and a physical thing on a wall does something a PDF does not.

Name it carefully. Academy and School are clean. I would think hard before using University — that word implies something about degree-granting and accreditation that a course business cannot deliver, and it invites scrutiny you have no reason to attract, particularly if what you teach sits anywhere near licensure.

That is the whole build. Which is exactly why the next question is the only one that matters.

What makes it worth paying for?

The difficulty. There is nothing else.

Think about what a certification is actually doing for the person who holds it. They are showing it to colleagues, to an employer, to patients or clients. Its entire value is what those people infer when they see it. And the only thing they can infer is this was not easy to get — because there is no board behind it to infer anything else from.

So the exam has to be able to fail people. Make it genuinely hard. Set the bar high enough that a meaningful number of people do not clear it on the first attempt. You are not being difficult for its own sake; you are manufacturing the only scarcity the thing has.

The version that decays is the one where everybody passes. It works beautifully for about eighteen months, and then enough people in the profession hold it that it stops signalling anything, and the letters become noise. You will have sold a lot of certificates and destroyed the asset that was generating the revenue.

A certification that is hard to get gets more valuable as more people hold it. One that is easy to get gets less valuable as more people hold it. Same product, opposite curves, and the only difference is the exam.

Recertification works on the same logic. A two-year renewal — retest, or submit evidence of continued work in the area — gives you recurring revenue, and buyers of course businesses like recurring revenue a great deal. But it is only defensible if renewal means something. A renewal that is purely an invoice is a subscription wearing a costume, and your holders will work that out.

What about making it accredited?

Here is where I want to be direct, because this practice is common and you will run into it.

Some businesses in this space set up a second company — a separate legal entity, given an official- sounding name — and then have that entity "accredit" their own certification. On the sales page it reads as third-party validation. In reality it is the same owner on both sides of the table.

Do not do this. It is not illegal in most framings, and it demonstrably works in the short run. It is simply a lie told to a professional who is trusting you, and you cannot build a durable education business on people finding out later that the validation was you.

If official recognition matters for what you teach, the real route is official continuing education accreditation through an actual accrediting body — a separate decision with its own costs and its own timing. What you should not do is manufacture the appearance of it.

Sell the certification as what it is: your program, your standard, your name on it. If your name is worth something, that is enough. If it is not worth anything yet, no invented accrediting body will fix that — which brings us to the last question.

When should I add one?

Not at launch.

You can, technically. Nothing prevents it. But a certification borrows credibility, it does not create it, and on day one you have none to borrow. A designation from someone nobody in the profession has heard of is a harder sell than the course would have been on its own.

Give it a year. Publish, teach, get reviews, let people encounter your name a few times. Once you are someone whose opinion carries weight in your corner of the field, the same certification that would have been a hard sell becomes something people actively want, because now the letters point at somebody.

Then attach it to your best work — the course that already sells, that you already know teaches something real. Not to a thin product you are hoping the designation will rescue.

The certification multiplies what is underneath it. That is the whole mechanism, and it is also the warning: it multiplies whatever is there, and if what is there is thin, you have built a sophisticated way to sell a thin thing at a higher price to people who trusted you.

Make the course good. Make the exam hard. Put your own name on it and stand behind it.

New to all of this? The free masterclass covers the ideas the library takes for granted. Watch it — thirty-seven minutes, on demand.